Freemarket

Freemarket.com Marketplace

Saturday, August 31, 2013

Pressy: A Physical, Programmable Button for Android Devices

Pressy

Saturday, August 3, 2013

THE INSIDE STORY OF THE MOTO X:THE PHONE THAT REVEALS WHY GOOGLE BOUGHT MOTOROLA



Almost exactly two years ago, Google announced its purchase of Motorola Mobility for $12.5 billion. It was the company’s biggest deal ever, far exceeding previous big buys like YouTube for $1.7 billion and DoubleClick for $3.1 billion. Both of those acquisitions were hugely successful, but the Motorola purchase seemed baffling. Mainly, it seemed to provide Google with valuable intellectual property that would allow the company to defend itself against a tidal wave of patent lawsuits. Motorola—the inventor of the very first cell phone—had a great patent portfolio indeed. But the estimated worth of those patents was less than half Google’s purchase price. The other portion brought Google a money-bleeding Chicago-area-based hardware business. The purchase would almost double Google’s head count with employees who brought little to the bottom line. Employees who were not Googly, in a business that seemingly didn’t scale. What was Google thinking?

Finally, we have the answer. The Moto X, announced today, marks the arrival, finally, of the Google Phone.

The Moto X is the first in a series of hardware products that Google hopes will supercharge the mother company’s software and services. A svelte slab with smooth curves at its edge, purpose-built to fit in the palm of your hand. It is designed for mass appeal, not just a slice of the population like Star Wars fans. It has its share of features that distinguish it from the pack, particularly in a period where some of the market leaders are reloading their innovation guns. These include persistent notifications, user-customizable design components, instant photo-capture, and hands-free authentication.
But the defining feature of the Moto X is it’s a virtual ear, always straining to hear its owner’s voice say three magic words that will rouse it to action: “Okay, Google Now.”
Utter those, and a Moto X user becomes master of the universe—to the degree that Google, its developers, and the users themselves have digitized it. The Android mobile operating system was always intended as a gateway drug to Google products and ads. (“We don’t monetize the things we create,” Android creator Andy Rubin once told me. “We monetize users.”) And Moto X is a tool to free-base Google. That’s why, after years of Rubin and others saying, “There is no Google phone,” when referring to Android implementations, this one finally qualifies.

Thursday, August 1, 2013

Hats off

Hackers gather—and mourn a big loss


EVERY summer Las Vegas plays host to Black Hat, a security shindig where spooks, businesspeople and academics rub shoulders with some of the world’s most talented hackers. The event briefly overlaps with DEFCON, a more informal affair where hackers try to impress one another with their exploits. Both events offer a mix of partying and presentations with disconcerting titles such as “Stalking a City for Fun and Frivolity”, “Home Invasion 2.0” and “Dude, WTF in my car?”
But one of hackerdom’s stars did not make it to this year’s jamborees. On July 25th Barnaby Jack was found dead in San Francisco, where he lived. He was only 35. An extremely popular “white hat”—a hacker who specialises in finding security flaws before nefarious “black hats” discover them—he had been due to give a presentation entitled “Implantable Medical Devices: Hacking Humans”.
Mr Jack had said previously that he had found a flaw in medical devices, such as heart pacemakers and defibrillators, made by an unnamed manufacturer, which could allow an outsider to communicate with them wirelessly. He was planning to show how this could be exploited to make the device malfunction or shut down, using a signal sent from up to 30 feet (9 metres) away. In a blog post earlier this year, he noted that an episode of “Homeland”, a popular American television show, in which a terrorist kills one of the characters by gaining control of his pacemaker, was not as far-fetched as it may have seemed.
The San Francisco police have ruled out foul play, but local medical authorities say it could be some time before the cause of death is established. What is clear is Mr Jack’s immense contribution in the field of “embedded” computers, which work inside other single-purpose appliances. Among his other headline-grabbing feats, he showed how some ATMs could be hacked so that they spewed out banknotes—an exploit dubbed “Jackpotting”. He had also highlighted vulnerabilities in insulin pumps, similar to the flaws in other implanted devices that he was planning to expose this year. In all these cases he shared his findings with the manufacturers before publicising them.
Even so, some worry that by trumpeting their findings at events such as Black Hat and DEFCON, white hats give clues which their shady counterparts could exploit in crime, terrorism or espionage. But the hackers’ defenders say the publicity alerts regulators, and ensures that as many companies as possible learn of the risks quickly. They also point out that the presentations typically leave out important steps so others cannot reproduce hacks. Nico Sell, who has been helping organise DEFCON for over a decade, notes, for example, that Mr Jack agreed to delay presenting his Jackpotting findings for a year, when a manufacturer of ATMs said it needed longer to deal with the bug that he had uncovered.

Friday, July 5, 2013

Malaysian Taxi App TaxiMonger Expands Coverage Outside Kuala Lumpur To Deal With Ongoing Rivalry

TaxiMonger logo

Malaysian taxi-booking app TaxiMonger has just expanded its service outside the capital city of Kuala Lumpur to cover Johor Bahru (the state sharing the border with Singapore). Additionally, it will run a Singapore-to-Johor service in a deal with cab operator JB-Tek, which currently runs that route.
The decision to expand its service coverage is set against a backdrop of an ongoing skirmish for smartphone-familiar drivers in Kuala Lumpur. This scene was described to me last month when I visited the state, where two of the main taxi apps, MyTeksi and Rocket-backed Easytaxi, were battling for a larger share of the drivers out there.
TaxiMonger’s CEO and co-founder, Nizran Noordin, said it’s tough getting drivers onboard, in spite of the touted benefits of being hooked up to a central app that alerts you of jobs.
Breaking down the cost, he said a driver makes on average US$40 a day, before deducting $20 for vehicle rental and petrol costs of about $10. With a meager salary, a $100 smartphone is still priced above a comfortable rate for many, he said.
Going through cab operators is tough as well, because of a fragmented market in Malaysia, where 31,000 taxis are opened by 210 companies. The companies aren’t providing Android devices, so TaxiMonger has been approaching individual drivers to try to get them onboard.
Rocket Internet’s Joon Chan also said only about 10 to 15 percent of drivers in the country have smartphones.
It seems TaxiMonger’s decision to expand coverage will provide it some respite for now from the current scene in Kuala Lumpur.
The app is free, and layers on a $0.63 (RM2) booking fee to be paid to the driver. MyTeksi, on the other hand, charges drivers between US$0.16 (50 sen) and US$0.30 (RM1) per successful pick-up.
TaxiMonger went through the SeedStartup program and launched in June 2012. Noordin says the company has 500 taxis registered, and has a deal with the airport taxi operator, covering another 2,000 cars.

Sunday, June 30, 2013

The car that parks itself

Autonomous vehicles are arriving piecemeal, as more and more driving tasks are taken out of human hands



CARS that need no driver are just around the corner according to Google, which has been testing vehicles bristling with aerials and cameras on public roads in America. But Google does not make cars (yet), so it will be up to firms that do to bring the technology to market. And carmakers are a conservative bunch. Still, slowly and steadily the autonomous car will arrive, with the help of an increasing number of automated driving aids. Volvo recently demonstrated one such feature: a car that really does park itself.
Some cars already have systems that assist with parking, but these are not completely autonomous. They can identify an empty parallel-parking space and steer into it while the driver uses the brake. The Volvo system, however, lets the driver get out and use a smartphone application to instruct the vehicle to park. The car then trundles off, manoeuvres into a parking place and sends a message to the driver to inform him where it is. The driver can collect the car in person or use his phone to call it back to where he dropped it off. Autonomous parking could thus be provided at places like shopping centres and airports, which are controlled areas in which automated vehicles can be managed more easily than on open highways.
In the past, designs for doing this have relied on car parks being fitted with buried guide wires that a vehicle can follow to an empty bay. That, though, creates a chicken-and-egg problem: car-park operators will not invest in such infrastructure until there is a sufficient number of suitably equipped cars on the road. Drivers, conversely, will not want to buy self-parking cars if there is nowhere to use them.
This means, as Mikael Thor, a Volvo safety engineer working on the project, observes, that for autonomous parking to work most of the technology will have to be in the car itself. The Volvo test car, which looks like a normal car, therefore uses on-board GPS mapping, cameras with image-recognition software, and radar sensors to find its own way around a car park and avoid pedestrians and non-autonomous vehicles. Mr Thor says the system is five to ten years from commercial deployment. If it proves a success then infrastructure might adapt to it, for instance by packing cars into tighter spaces (with no one in them there is no need to make room for their doors to open), but would not need to anticipate it.
Look, no hands
Driverless cars would also need to communicate with one another, to enhance safety. That, too, is coming. A number of carmakers are developing wireless networking systems through which vehicles can exchange data, such as their speed, their steering angle and even their weight, to forewarn anti-collision systems and safety devices if an accident looks likely.
Ford, for example, recently tested a brake light that can provide an early warning to other motorists. If the brakes are applied hard in an emergency, a signal is broadcast. This illuminates a warning light in the dashboard of suitably equipped following vehicles, even if they are out of sight around a bend or not immediately behind the vehicle doing the braking.
Ford has been testing this system as part of a collaborative research project with several European carmakers. They have put a fleet of 150 experimental vehicles on the roads. When it tested a group of these, Ford found the technology let drivers brake much earlier, helping avoid collisions. A driverless car would be able to react even faster.
Another member of the research group, BMW, has been testing driverless cars on roads around Munich—including belting down some of Germany’s high-speed autobahns. The ordinary-looking BMW 5-series models use a variety of self-contained guidance systems. These include cameras mounted on the upper windscreen, which can identify road markings, signs and various obstacles likely to be encountered on roads.
The BMWs also use a radar, to gauge how far the vehicle is from other cars and potential obstacles, and a lidar, which works like a radar but at optical frequencies. The lidar employs laser beams to scan the road ahead and builds up from the reflections a three-dimensional image of what this looks like. The image is processed by a computer in the vehicle, which also collects and compares data from a high-accuracy GPS unit. A series of ultrasonic sonars similar to those used in vehicles to provide parking assistance are placed around the car to add to the virtual picture. And just to make sure, a set of accelerometers provide an inertial navigation system that double-checks the vehicle’s position on the road.
Although these cars can be switched to an autonomous driving mode, like Google’s vehicles they are still required to have someone in the driving seat who can take over in the event of any difficulty. The BMWs can steer themselves, slow down, brake and accelerate, even changing lanes to overtake slower vehicles. BMW, though, does not yet talk of when it might offer fully autonomous cars to customers; rather it says that it expects to see “highly automated” driving functions available in its models from around 2020.
Policymakers want to see more development before fully autonomous cars are sold to the public. California and a number of other American states have licensed experimental self-driving cars, provided they have someone on board who can take control if needed. For the time being, this is about all that is likely to be allowed. America’s National Highway Traffic Safety Administration said recently that it believes self-driving cars could bring great safety and other benefits, but at this stage it does not think completely autonomous vehicles should be permitted on public roads, other than for testing. Self-parking cars may be one way drivers and regulators gain confidence in the technology.

Thursday, June 20, 2013

Gorilla Glass May Soon Be Used For Car Windshields



Brett Smith for redOrbit.com – Your Universe Online
Gorilla Glass is probably best known as the (somewhat) impervious cover of approximately 1.5 billion smartphone screens.
According to Corning, the company could soon be shipping the mighty glass to automakers, which would be looking to take advantage of its lighter weight and soundproofing capabilities. A Gorilla Glass equipped car would theoretically offer a quieter ride with better gas mileage.
In comments made after MIT Technology Review’s Mobile Summit in San Francisco on Tuesday, Corning senior vice president Jeffrey Evenson said he expects at least one high-end auto maker to begin building cars that use some Gorilla Glass within the next year.
The installation of Gorilla Glass in cars would bring the Corning project full circle. The company experimentedwith car windshield technology in the 1960s. That research eventually laid the foundation for the development of modern-day Gorilla Glass.
The revelation comes just after Corning announced the release of the next generation of Gorilla Glass technology in May, Corning Gorilla Glass 3 with Native Damage Resistance. James R. Steiner, senior vice president and general manager of Corning’s Specialty Materials department noted that the company is continuing to develop Gorilla Glass technology.
“We aren’t standing still,” he said. “We’ve already introduced three versions of Gorilla Glass since its launch in 2007.”
“We work closely with consumer electronics manufacturers to understand their new designs and additional features for future devices,” he added. “For example, we’ve begun to produce Gorilla Glass at a thinness level that allows it to be curved and formed into shapes without sacrificing any of its toughness. This will allow manufacturers to offer more distinctive devices in the future.”
Steiner also said that future iterations of Gorilla Glass will reduce reflections, addressing the common consumer complaint associated with viewing mobile device screens in bright sunlight: glare.
Some observers have speculated that manufactured sapphire crystal might become a viable alternative to Corning’s Gorilla Glass, citing its use in the production of high-end watches. Corning officials have said that strength tests have shown that sapphire is not as strong as Gorilla Glass.
In his comments this week, Evenson also revealed several other endeavors the company is pursuing. One technology currently in the development stage is “antimicrobial” glass that is scheduled to be certified by the Environmental Protection Agency within the next few months, Evenson said. The groundbreaking material is designed for use in the health-care industry, as a sanitation aid, but could be used in other applications.
“The bacteria are obliterated,” Evenson said. “The number of germs on a smartphone exceeds the number of germs on a public toilet. We think there might be a bigger market.”
“Once we are ready to commercialize this version of Gorilla Glass, the application possibilities are enormous, including hospitals, public spaces, schools, and mobile devices and so forth,” Steiner remarked on the technology in an earlier statement.
Another highly-anticipated Corning product, Willow Glass, is described as being flexible like plastic, as thin as a dollar bill, yet retaining the durability and stability of glass. Evenson said Willow Glass could lead to “hundreds of new products,” from flexible displays to new insulating layers in semiconductors.

Source: Brett Smith for redOrbit.com - Your Universe Online

Monday, June 17, 2013

Behold: Fighter-Jet Augmented Reality for Your Motorcycle Commute


Image: LiveMap

Google Glass has the potential to revolutionize how we get information on the move, but a team of Russian motorcyclists-slash-engineers are going one step further with an augmented reality GPS system built directly into a bike helmet.
Based in Moscow, the LiveMap crew got fed up with paper maps and unintuitive touch-screen navigation systems, so they looked to the world of fighter jets for a solution.
The result is a full-color, translucent image projected onto a helmet’s visor running a version of Android and controlled through voice commands.
Instead of a Google Glass-like setup where the rider would have to look up and to the right to see the next waypoint or turn, the LiveMap system displays everything directly in the middle of the rider’s point-of-view. That might sound dangerous at first, but it’s execution is similar to what you’d find in the latest BMW sports sedans, and with an ambient light sensor, the system can adjust the brightness and contrast to suit the environment.
Even more impressive is the integration of a gyroscope and digital compass, so when the rider turns his head — say, to check a blind spot — the image changes orientation to acclimate to the movement.
Voice controls and point of interest searches will supposedly be provided by Nuance, the top-shelf company that helps Siri understand commands, while mapping software will come from the folks at Navteq.
A pair of 3,000 mAh lithium-ion batteries claim to provide enough juice for a day-long ride and charge up using a standard USB plug. And while LiveMap admits that the helmet will be slightly larger than a standard brain pan, they’re using a carbon fiber shell with injection-molded foam to keep weight in check. All in, the helmet should come in around 2.5 pounds, and will meet all the major crash certifications around the world (DOT, ECE 22.05 and Japan’s JIS T 8133) when it goes on sale in the U.S., U.K., Canada and Australia in 2014, while Europe and Japan have to wait an additional year to take delivery.
Currently, LiveMap has developed the helmet, software, optics and board with funding from a range of Russian government sources, but it doesn’t have a fully-functional prototype yet. So the team is turning to Indiegogo to raise $150,000, with backers coughing up $1,500 a pop to get their hands on the first round of helmets. After that, LiveMaps says the price will go up to $2,000 each — a seriously steep sticker for something most bike experts suggest you replace every five years.
Considering how much we love our current helmet, we’d be much more inclined to plunk down the coin for a retrofitted system, but considering the lack of intuitive navigation options on the market, we could be swayed.